starving_dog
06-01 01:47 PM
Have a great vacation....'nuf said?
wallpaper keith urban nicole kidman baby
malibuguy007
10-01 07:41 PM
Please help with funding when you get your issue resolved
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=21817
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=21817
cmatiazzo
05-12 02:46 PM
Hi Everybody!!
I am new at this site and I have a question!!
My lawyer submitted the ETA 9089 on Dec. 2007 , we've been checking the case # A-XXXXX-XXXXX and the only thing that shows is: PROCESSING...
Isnt supposed to be 30 days??
My situation is really bad because right now my driver license expired and I cant renew without an Immigration Case Number, but my process stil on DOL as "processing"
Any suggestion or Comments??
Thanks
I am new at this site and I have a question!!
My lawyer submitted the ETA 9089 on Dec. 2007 , we've been checking the case # A-XXXXX-XXXXX and the only thing that shows is: PROCESSING...
Isnt supposed to be 30 days??
My situation is really bad because right now my driver license expired and I cant renew without an Immigration Case Number, but my process stil on DOL as "processing"
Any suggestion or Comments??
Thanks
2011 Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban
belmontboy
05-01 06:50 PM
My firend lost his PERM approval document. Has anyone had the same experience?
What are the steps to get a duplicate approval Perm document?
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/perm_faqs_3-20-06.pdf
i am not sure if u can get the copy. might want to check with some lawyer.
What are the steps to get a duplicate approval Perm document?
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/perm_faqs_3-20-06.pdf
i am not sure if u can get the copy. might want to check with some lawyer.
more...
Blog Feeds
08-09 10:00 PM
While abolishing birthright citizenship is a long-shot issue for anti-immigrants, some are setting their hopes on a target that they hope is easier to hit - the right of all children in the US to a public school education. But you say that the Supreme Court ended the discussion on this nearly 30 years ago in the Plyler case when they held that all children in the US - even those illegally present - have the right to attend public schools under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. Silly you, the antis are hoping that enough conservatives have been...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/antis-next-target-public-school-education-for-all-children.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/antis-next-target-public-school-education-for-all-children.html)
lifestrikes
03-28 03:25 PM
I plan to tweet during my 3 days at DC during Advocacy Days, so I figured it will be easy if we have a hashtag for twitter.
I was thinking #IV11
Anyone else planning to tweet during the event (between meetings)?
I was thinking #IV11
Anyone else planning to tweet during the event (between meetings)?
more...
martinvisalaw
09-21 12:29 PM
Both cards should arrive to the address that CIS has on file for the couple. The wife's departure from the US should not affect this. However, she needs to have the card to return to the US, ideally. Hopefully husband can send her the card.
2010 Married: Keith Urban since
Blog Feeds
01-15 11:20 AM
In the early 1960s, President Eisenhower worked with the Catholic Church to airlift 14,000+ unaccompanied minors from Cuba to America in an effort called Operation Pedro Pan. In a similar effort, President Obama is working with the Catholic Church to possibly airlift thousands of orphans from Haiti and allow them to remain in the US in a humanitarian parole status. Obviously, this will be a huge challenge and it is always a difficult decision to remove children from their homeland, but the future for orphans in Haiti seems very grim.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/catholic-church-white-house-planning-to-airlift-orphans-from-haiti.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/01/catholic-church-white-house-planning-to-airlift-orphans-from-haiti.html)
more...
Macaca
11-01 09:51 AM
Committee of One (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/31/AR2007103102559.html?hpid=opinionsbox1) By Robert D. Novak | Washington Post, November 1, 2007
A story told in cloakrooms of the House of Representatives shows how ironic life on Capitol Hill can be. Jim McCrery, the low-key, hardworking ranking Republican on the Ways and Means Committee, has spent all year trying to establish good relations with the tax-writing committee's first Democratic chairman in 12 years, Charles Rangel. He succeeded, only to discover that Rangel does not really run Ways and Means. Nancy Pelosi does.
Rangel, a crafty New York politician, so far looks like the weakest Ways and Means chairman during my 50 years in Washington. That's only because Pelosi so far is the most powerful speaker of the House during that same period, a reality obscured by her historic role as the first woman to hold that office. She does not confer with or defer to standing committee chairmen, whose predecessors made previous speakers dance to their tune.
On both sides of the aisle, the 67-year-old grandmother from San Francisco is referred to as the "Committee of One" who rules the House. Many speakers over the years relied on their majority leader, as Republican Dennis Hastert let Tom DeLay handle day-to-day operations. But not Pelosi, who actually opposed Steny Hoyer's election as majority leader.
Ruling absolutely does not mean all Democrats think she rules well. Her misguided effort to pass a resolution condemning the 1915 Armenian genocide constitutes a rare public blunder, but beyond that she has not crafted a coherent Democratic message. This month's Harris Poll puts her nationwide job disapproval ("fair" or "poor") at 57 percent. But she is an icon at the Democratic grass roots, and none of the committee chairmen who have been downgraded by her -- certainly not Rangel -- utters a word of public criticism.
Rangel's massive tax reform proposal, released last week, gets less respect than is normally accorded to a Ways and Means chairman's plan, because Pelosi is not on board. Rangel's desire to compromise with the Bush administration on international trade agreements has been frustrated because the speaker defers to Rangel's trade subcommittee chairman, Sander Levin, who follows organized labor's protectionist line.
Much the same treatment has been experienced by John Dingell, the senior member of Congress, as Energy and Commerce Committee chairman. In bygone days, Dingell deferred to neither Democratic presidents nor speakers. But Pelosi is determined to pass an energy bill this year even though it means crossing Dingell, who as a Detroiter opposes Californian Pelosi on vehicle mileage and emission standards. A sage old professional, Dingell knows there is no political profit in publicly clashing with Madam Speaker.
No committee chairman wants to take the risk of going public against Pelosi, including one who sought her advice -- and, hopefully, support -- on a controversial matter of House business. This anonymous chairman was rebuffed by the speaker, who declined to talk to him, in person or over the telephone.
Being the "Committee of One" does not mean Pelosi is without lieutenants. She is close to two fellow Californians, both fiercely partisan, who head committees: George Miller (Education and Labor) and Henry Waxman (Oversight and Government Reform). Miller is regarded as her consigliere, always at her side. She is also considered close to moderate chairmen Ike Skelton (Armed Services) and John Spratt (Budget), plus liberal chairman Barney Frank (Financial Services).
That does not mean, however, that she always takes their advice. Witness her big blunder as speaker. Skelton, a seasoned student of international relations, told her the Armenian resolution would antagonize Turkey and thus constituted a foreign policy debacle in the making. Rahm Emanuel, the House Democratic Caucus chairman, also opposed it (as he had when serving as President Bill Clinton's political aide). Pelosi insisted until some 45 House Democrats -- including Skelton -- opposed her.
The Armenian episode suggests a Pelosi decision has to approach the brink of disaster before Democrats speak out. Her popularity in the party beyond Capitol Hill is too great. When I asked one esteemed Democratic operative whether Pelosi's authority is without restraint, he called that a sexist question because I never would have asked that about Sam Rayburn or Tip O'Neill. Indeed, I would not have. They were not that powerful.
A story told in cloakrooms of the House of Representatives shows how ironic life on Capitol Hill can be. Jim McCrery, the low-key, hardworking ranking Republican on the Ways and Means Committee, has spent all year trying to establish good relations with the tax-writing committee's first Democratic chairman in 12 years, Charles Rangel. He succeeded, only to discover that Rangel does not really run Ways and Means. Nancy Pelosi does.
Rangel, a crafty New York politician, so far looks like the weakest Ways and Means chairman during my 50 years in Washington. That's only because Pelosi so far is the most powerful speaker of the House during that same period, a reality obscured by her historic role as the first woman to hold that office. She does not confer with or defer to standing committee chairmen, whose predecessors made previous speakers dance to their tune.
On both sides of the aisle, the 67-year-old grandmother from San Francisco is referred to as the "Committee of One" who rules the House. Many speakers over the years relied on their majority leader, as Republican Dennis Hastert let Tom DeLay handle day-to-day operations. But not Pelosi, who actually opposed Steny Hoyer's election as majority leader.
Ruling absolutely does not mean all Democrats think she rules well. Her misguided effort to pass a resolution condemning the 1915 Armenian genocide constitutes a rare public blunder, but beyond that she has not crafted a coherent Democratic message. This month's Harris Poll puts her nationwide job disapproval ("fair" or "poor") at 57 percent. But she is an icon at the Democratic grass roots, and none of the committee chairmen who have been downgraded by her -- certainly not Rangel -- utters a word of public criticism.
Rangel's massive tax reform proposal, released last week, gets less respect than is normally accorded to a Ways and Means chairman's plan, because Pelosi is not on board. Rangel's desire to compromise with the Bush administration on international trade agreements has been frustrated because the speaker defers to Rangel's trade subcommittee chairman, Sander Levin, who follows organized labor's protectionist line.
Much the same treatment has been experienced by John Dingell, the senior member of Congress, as Energy and Commerce Committee chairman. In bygone days, Dingell deferred to neither Democratic presidents nor speakers. But Pelosi is determined to pass an energy bill this year even though it means crossing Dingell, who as a Detroiter opposes Californian Pelosi on vehicle mileage and emission standards. A sage old professional, Dingell knows there is no political profit in publicly clashing with Madam Speaker.
No committee chairman wants to take the risk of going public against Pelosi, including one who sought her advice -- and, hopefully, support -- on a controversial matter of House business. This anonymous chairman was rebuffed by the speaker, who declined to talk to him, in person or over the telephone.
Being the "Committee of One" does not mean Pelosi is without lieutenants. She is close to two fellow Californians, both fiercely partisan, who head committees: George Miller (Education and Labor) and Henry Waxman (Oversight and Government Reform). Miller is regarded as her consigliere, always at her side. She is also considered close to moderate chairmen Ike Skelton (Armed Services) and John Spratt (Budget), plus liberal chairman Barney Frank (Financial Services).
That does not mean, however, that she always takes their advice. Witness her big blunder as speaker. Skelton, a seasoned student of international relations, told her the Armenian resolution would antagonize Turkey and thus constituted a foreign policy debacle in the making. Rahm Emanuel, the House Democratic Caucus chairman, also opposed it (as he had when serving as President Bill Clinton's political aide). Pelosi insisted until some 45 House Democrats -- including Skelton -- opposed her.
The Armenian episode suggests a Pelosi decision has to approach the brink of disaster before Democrats speak out. Her popularity in the party beyond Capitol Hill is too great. When I asked one esteemed Democratic operative whether Pelosi's authority is without restraint, he called that a sexist question because I never would have asked that about Sam Rayburn or Tip O'Neill. Indeed, I would not have. They were not that powerful.
hair Tag Archives: Keith Urban
kirupa
05-06 06:11 PM
I liked your first one more also! I have added that one up :)
more...
Blog Feeds
09-02 05:30 PM
Governor Charlie Cristhas named his aide George LeMieux to fill the seat of Senator Mel Martinez until next year's midterm elections when Crist will run for the seat. America's Voice warns that the new Senator will ignore immigration to his own peril.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/floridas-new-senator-a-blank-slate-on-immigration.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/08/floridas-new-senator-a-blank-slate-on-immigration.html)
hot Nicole Kidman was sent a
virens
12-09 01:54 AM
I got an email from USCIS saying my I-485 case is now transferred to National Benefits Centre and is now pending standard processing at a USCIS office.
I am travelling to India currently and plan to re-enter on AP.
I wanted to know if
1. anyone has any ideas as to what this really means, anyone received similar email, experiences?
My priority date is not current so are they pre-adjudicating my case or planning to send a RFE??
2. Should I take any specific steps while re-entering on AP?
Thanks
I am travelling to India currently and plan to re-enter on AP.
I wanted to know if
1. anyone has any ideas as to what this really means, anyone received similar email, experiences?
My priority date is not current so are they pre-adjudicating my case or planning to send a RFE??
2. Should I take any specific steps while re-entering on AP?
Thanks
more...
house Nicole Kidman and Keith Urban
mna123
07-30 05:37 PM
I am stuck out side of US for my name check for last 9 months. I have approved I 140. is there any way I can file my I 1485 and Advance parole or any thing to get back into US.
Some one has told me that I can use consular processing but have no idea about that.
Please help me and let me know what are possible options for me to return to US.
Some one has told me that I can use consular processing but have no idea about that.
Please help me and let me know what are possible options for me to return to US.
tattoo Nicole Kidman,Keith Urban
ruchigup
08-21 04:46 PM
<
more...
pictures NICOLE Kidman hopes her
gcnirvana
06-10 07:02 PM
You can do it yourself. Its easy with e-filing and so many (including yours truly) in this forum have done it. Check out this thread for more info:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18737
And please contribute that attorney fee to IV :)
Is it easy to do that myself? Or do I need to go through an attorney?
Please advise.
Thanks!
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18737
And please contribute that attorney fee to IV :)
Is it easy to do that myself? Or do I need to go through an attorney?
Please advise.
Thanks!
dresses keith urban and nicole kidman
meridiani.planum
07-01 03:06 AM
When exporing new oppty's via AC21 with companies:
is it Ok to share copy of one's 140 or 485 document copies?
approval notice copies should be ok (check with company's HR if in doubt). However supporting financial/planning documents of a company may not be ok (that kind of stuff could be confidential to the company)
is it Ok to share copy of one's 140 or 485 document copies?
approval notice copies should be ok (check with company's HR if in doubt). However supporting financial/planning documents of a company may not be ok (that kind of stuff could be confidential to the company)
more...
makeup Nicole Kidman visits Wetten
Brad56
08-04 02:10 AM
I have bachelors degree in law and 7 years human resource training development manager. Could I apply for eb2?
girlfriend photo of nicole kidman and
ak_2006
03-10 03:26 PM
By this I hope there will be lot of movement for EB2 I/C.
hairstyles with husband Keith Urban,
Leo07
10-26 04:23 PM
Immigration hard-liners to lead Judiciary? - Simmi Aujla - POLITICO.com (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/44144.html)
ramreddy
07-20 04:51 PM
Hi Folks
I am trying to get Visa Appointment for my Mom.
<> For Mumbai appointment how long is it taking ? any idea ?
This tool is supposed to provide the earliest available appt. date:
https://www.vfs-usa.co.in/ApplnForms/EarliestDate.aspx
But does not show any date after all info is entered.
<> They want some fees to be paid via HDFC bank .
Is there a way , I can do it sitting in USA ?
<>My Mom is a working professional having her own enterprise in India. She got 10 year Multiple Entry visa in past. How will they view her application ? will it have ANY bearing on the fact that I applied for GC and my PD is now current ?
PL let me know
Thx
Rama
I am trying to get Visa Appointment for my Mom.
<> For Mumbai appointment how long is it taking ? any idea ?
This tool is supposed to provide the earliest available appt. date:
https://www.vfs-usa.co.in/ApplnForms/EarliestDate.aspx
But does not show any date after all info is entered.
<> They want some fees to be paid via HDFC bank .
Is there a way , I can do it sitting in USA ?
<>My Mom is a working professional having her own enterprise in India. She got 10 year Multiple Entry visa in past. How will they view her application ? will it have ANY bearing on the fact that I applied for GC and my PD is now current ?
PL let me know
Thx
Rama
eyeswe
03-04 01:45 PM
http://www.immigrationboards.com/
for all UK related visa issues
for all UK related visa issues
No comments:
Post a Comment